Sibelius 8.2 released with new “sliding” feature and enharmonic differences in parts

News

Today Avid released Sibelius 8.2. As with other 8.x releases, it is a free update for all 8.x users with an active license (virtually anyone with Sibelius 8.x other than those who may have had a month-to-month subscription).

sib-8-2

About the new release, Sibelius senior product manager Sam Butler said, “[Sibelius product designer] Joe Pearson and I are really pleased with the features included in 8.2. Some of these came from direct conversations with Sibelius customers on the forums, beta testers, tweets and customer visits. The new feature to allow you to have independent spellings for your accidentals in score and parts came from our meetings with the engravers and orchestrators at Joann Kane Music Service and Patrick Kirst, Hollywood film score composer, in January this year while we were in Los Angeles for the annual NAMM show, who both had this feature at the top of their wish lists.”

As previewed late last week on several web sites including Avid’s own site, the main new features in Sibelius 8.2 are:

  • Independent enharmonic spelling of notes in a part compared to the score
  • Correct placement of time signatures placed before start repeats
  • Ability to move notes and rests horizontally

There are a couple of other nice improvements, as well:

  • More realistic handling of interpolated bar rests with the “magnetic” rest feature introduced in Sibelius 8.1
  • Adding a final barline at the end of the score will no longer cause a new bar to be created (hooray!)
  • Better localization of the Quick Start dialog (for non-English versions)
  • Correcting an “Unhandled Error” crash report (Windows only)

Let’s dive in and check out the new features.

Independent enharmonic spelling in score and part

It’s hard to believe that dynamic parts — parts which retain their relationship to the score in the same file, while allowing for formatting and layout differences — have been around for more than ten years, since the release of Sibelius 4 in 2005.

Finale 2007 (released in 2006) followed with its similar linked parts feature, and the feature set between the two programs in this area has been generally comparable since that time. The two main advantages that Finale users had over Sibelius users in this area were voiced parts and the ability to spell a note independently in a part compared to the score.

With today’s update, Sibelius 8.2 brings parity to the latter of those two features. This is very welcome news if you work with concert scores where spelling can vary quite significantly in a transposed part:

enharmonic

This is achieved quite simply by selecting a note or a passage of notes and pressing Return on the main keyboard (or, the long way, by going to Note Input > Note Input > Respell in the Ribbon). This works as it did before, of course, but the difference now is that if you respell a note while in the part, the spelling changes only for that part, and not for the score — or, for that matter, other parts that may be using the the same staff.

The latter point is actually important. You might, for instance, have a band score that has a euphonium in concert pitch, and parts for both a euphonium and a baritone horn, which is transposed at the major 9th. It is possible now to respell a note in the baritone horn part while leaving both the score and the euphonium part unchanged.

As demonstrated in the example above, it is quite easy to tell which notes have been enharmonically adjusted. They are turned orange, like other differences between the part and the score, if View > Invisibles > Differences In Parts is checked.

Notice how even the courtesy accidentals are correct in the last bar in all three examples above.

Should you wish to reset the part to its original spelling, go to Appearance > Design and Position > Design (shortcut Command-Shift-D on Mac or Ctrl+Shift+D on PC).

Note that, if you use a plug-in such as Respell Sharps as Flats or Respell Flats as Sharps, the plug-in will not have the same effect as this new feature, even if you run the plug-in while in a part. Also note that when a Sibelius 8.2 score is exported to an earlier version, any enharmonically modified notes in a part will revert to their default state.

For me, at least, this feature is the most useful engraving achievement in any of the Sibelius 8 releases so far, more so than even the magnetic rests feature. It’s not groundbreaking by any means — after all, it’s been around in Finale for nearly a decade — but it’s really the only improvement for which there has been no simple workaround (the only one I know of involves laboriously creating creative instrument changes in a part). It works as expected and is simple to use because it builds on how we already expect dynamic parts to work — kudos to the Sibelius team on introducing this feature.

Correct placement of time signatures placed before start repeats

It’s debatable whether this qualifies as a new feature or a bug fix, but no matter, it’s an improvement. It’s long been a pet peeve for many a Sibelius user that, when creating a start repeat barline that coincided with a time signature (like commonly at the beginning of a piece), the barline preceded the time signature instead of the other way around. Bob Zawalich even created a plug-in, Move Time Sig Repeat Barline, to deal with this annoyance.

Now, in Sibelius 8.2, the order of these items is correct by default.

repeat-time

Importantly (and not trivially), importing and exporting legacy scores preserves the score’s appearance in all cases. When importing legacy scores created in earlier versions of Sibelius, the original layout of time signatures and repeats is maintained so that those scores look the same as before. If you want to update the placement of time signatures and rests in a legacy score, simply delete and reinsert those repeats.

Likewise, you can export any scores with the new layout to an earlier version of Sibelius and it will maintain the updated repeat and time signature placement.

Comments

  1. Bernie Cossentino

    Welcome features and enhancements, especially the enharmonic respellings.

    Not regrouping the rests while moving notes horizontally is a troubling omission. I’m assuming they wanted to get this feature out the door regardless of the issue. Let’s hope they complete this feature properly….and include tuplets with that :-/

  2. Hans Nel

    The “independent enharmonic spelling of notes in a part compared to the score” is the only improvement I like about this update. They should have finished the “sliding note” feature before releasing it. I can’t see myself using that feature…but then I never had the desire to move notes horizontally, and it will screw my lyrics up completely.

    1. Joe Pearson

      Hi Hans,

      We’ve already improved the slide feature so that it automatically cleans up rests as you move your selection. We’re demoing it in a technical preview of Sibelius 8.3 at MusikMesse this week.

      You can also make lyrics part of your selection and move them at the same time.

      Joe

      1. Hans Nel

        Excellent!!

  3. Bob Zawalich

    The shipping plugin Combine Tied Notes and Rests (category Simplify Notation) will clean up the “fractured” rests – you can just use the “Rests” part of it. The plugin was written to deal with this very scenario of rests left behind after editing.

    It is not as good as having the program do it in the fly but is is a lot easier than doing it all by hand.

    I would occasionally find sliding notes useful, especially while composing. What I would really like, though, would be to have Sibelius change what happens when you increase the duration of a note.

    Say you have 2 quarter notes, and you really want a dotted quarter and an eighth. If you change the first note to have a dot, it will wipe out the second note entirely, leaving an 8th rest behind, and you have to recreate the 2nd note, assuming you remember what it was… I would really prefer it if Sib only removed the amount of duration from the following note that was needed by the first note. So if you dot the first note, change the next to an 8th note instead of wiping it out altogether.

    That makes changing to a dotted rhythm trivial whereas it is really a pain to do it now. It would be OK with me if it did what it does now if the following note was a tuplet, because those are hard to deal with, but I see no disadvantage to reducing duration rather than overwriting adjacent normal notes notes, and I think it would be very useful.

    But anyway, for now, check out Combine Tied Notes and Rests to consolidate fractured rests.

    1. Bernie Cossentino

      @ Bob Z. “What I would really like, though, would be to have Sibelius change what happens when you increase the duration of a note.

      Say you have 2 quarter notes, and you really want a dotted quarter and an eighth. If you change the first note to have a dot, it will wipe out the second note entirely, leaving an 8th rest behind, and you have to recreate the 2nd note, assuming you remember what it was… I would really prefer it if Sib only removed the amount of duration from the following note that was needed by the first note. So if you dot the first note, change the next to an 8th note instead of wiping it out altogether.”

      Bob, I totally agree. This is what I meant as well when saying “Let’s hope they complete this feature properly”.

      Time will tell.

      1. Philip Rothman

        I second the motion! I do think that there is potential here if these types of issues can get sorted.

  4. Kenneth Gaw

    If you like the sliding feature, I suggest you have a look at the Move Selection Left/Right Plugins which were posted in June of last year.

    http://www.scoringnotes.com/tips/three-new-plug-ins-from-kenneth-gaw/

    They basically do the same thing but behave slightly differently.

    Notes and tuplets can be moved but are never split, so the duration moved is the smallest possible one that avoids this.
    Bars left with only rests are converted to bar rests in voice 1 and cleared completely in other voices.

    Most other objects, such as dynamics, chord symbols, lines, repeat barlines, rehearsal marks and lyrics etc can be moved independently.
    (Lyrics realign themselves to the changed durations.)

    The code is quite slow if large passages are moved or if the score is very large, so the new 8.2 feature might be quite a bit faster.

    1. Philip Rothman

      Kenneth, many thanks for reminding us of your nice plug-in.

  5. Kenneth Gaw

    I came across the problem of notes being split when being pasted across the barline and remaining split thereafter when writing these plugins and avoided it by simply prohibiting any moves that split notes.
    I think it should be possible for the development team to add code that corrects this problem during any pasting operation. If a user pastes two tied quarter notes into the first two beats of a 4/4 bar for instance, then it would automatically be changed to a half note. This would work like the “Combined Tied Notes and Rests” plugin except that any options would probably contained in File>Preferences rather than a dialog that interrupted each pasting operation.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *